Maybe my focus should be on developing a public conversation about what are the alien agendas. What parts are good and what parts are harmful. I have to admit that I don’t know. I believe that the dominate alien force is benevolent but I cannot understand what they are doing in order to advance humanity. I think that they are doing things which are for a good purpose but some actions appear to be harmful. Several experiencers have told me, “There is no good and bad.” That has made me feel uncomfortable because I follow Buddhist ethics. But, I think what they mean is that at a higher level it’s not so simple to say good and bad. At a conventional level there is the normal ethics of not harming others. I get that. What we are talking about is that the methods that benevolent aliens use to help break us out of our limited thinking, are sometimes seen as bad but really it’s for the good, in the big picture. This is what I am getting at.
I feel that I should defer to the wisdom of the mantids and the Greys, just as theists feel they should leave it up to God to decide. What I am declaring now is that I don’t know the difference between right and wrong on a cosmic scale of action and intention. I do know the difference between right and wrong in my own personal actions with how I treat other people. But I am not qualified to judge what actions are going on politically and globally, which could be guided by benevolent aliens. For example, I don’t know if the globalist agenda to emphasize culturally new ideas about gender are based upon leadership from bad aliens or good aliens. Because I don’t know and I am being more public about admitting that I don’t know, this affects the future direction of what I am doing.
I feel that my role is to help facilitate a public conversation. My intention is to continue in the public forum and aim for the highest echelon of truth in the public domain. I assume that our secret governments are engaged in discussions of high echelons of truth but this is not public. I want to bring in guests and develop the highest echelon of truth in the world. My top three priorities at https://www.brianruhe.ca/welcome/ have already defined what I regard as the highest echelons or priorities for the world. Now, it’s a matter of going through the crucible of public opinion and debate to see if I am wrong, to see if anyone in the world has better ideas to improve upon these three.
More importantly, what matters is the willingness for people to have an ongoing open ended conversation, to act in good faith while trying to discuss the highest matters of truth for our planet. I think this will be difficult, harder than it seems. Some people don’t act in good faith and some of those people can be so deceptive that they convince most people that they are acting sincerely. And, even if everyone is sincere, their differences in view will result in emotionalism and outbursts. That is human nature and it’s hard to get away from human nature, isn’t it? Maybe AI would be more logical. So, I suggest that we just keep persisting in trying to have a group conversation about truth. What is the good, the true and the beautiful?
The big leagues in the truth movement are people like David Icke, Alex Jones and Joe Rogan. But the big leagues are not the highest leagues. The highest levels of truth are so unpopular that they cannot, by definition, be in the big leagues. For example, the truth about Talmudic power and the truth about Adolf Hitler. 99% of people would not deeply discuss these topics because they might lose their job and be shunned by family and friends. Therefore, the highest levels of truth that can be publicly discussed are not going to be famous and widely disseminated. I decided since 2013 to focus on a narrow, high niche of truth. That is my choice, partly because I just want to know the truth for myself. I can’t do that unless I talk with others who know more than I do, about the most important issues. I have chosen to do this publicly rather than privately. This helps others more and it is more practical for me.
In conclusion, I am asserting truth less and questioning more. I am publicly expressing more doubt and less certainty. I feel the humility of expressing that human beings are not at the top of the food chain, nor at the peak of wisdom. I do believe that there are mantid and Grey aliens and other aliens who are far wiser than human beings. I am choosing to defer to their wisdom but my dilemma is that I do not know what their wisdom is. I can’t tell what is right and what is wrong, geopolitically. I have to change what I say now. Since 2013 I have been declaring many things as right and wrong and good and bad, in over 2,000 videos. I spoke based upon my level of wisdom as a human being. But now, I am saying that I am only a human being. I believe that my wisdom and humanity’s wisdom as a collective, is inadequate to the task. This world needs help. I believe that the aliens are here to help. My purpose is twofold – to raise awareness about that and to facilitate it.
I believe that humanity should defer to the wisdom of benevolent aliens. But, I don’t know how to listen to that wisdom. I believe that some people can listen to it but they themselves are imperfect and their translation of that message is flawed. They themselves contradict each other. So, I am saying that what we need is the public conversation that I have described in this essay. I am participating in that conversation but I am not the leader. This requires people of good intention all over the world to engage in the highest echelons of truth, which is beyond me.
Brian Ruhe
April 3, 2022
